Scott Horton provides us with examples of the “aggressive interrogation techniques” condoned and authorized by the Bush administration. An excellent but disturbing piece about the woman behind the camera at Abu Ghraib in The New Yorker provided many of the details. Here’s a summary:
Enforced nudity. This technique is adopted for purposes of degrading and humiliating the prisoner, heightening his senses of vulnerability, weakness and shame. Enforced nudity also enhances other techniques, particularly hypothermia.
Starvation. As Davis notes, when the prisoner is entitled to an MRE, he would be given one component only of the MRE. The entire MRE constitutes a reasonable food ration which is properly balanced. Giving only one part of it reflects a decision to starve the prisoner.
Stress Positions. Perhaps the oldest and best established torture technique, widely used by the Inquisition in Europe, was the strapado. Hands would be fastened behind the back and the victim would be hoisted, causing severe stress to joints, frequent dislocation, and severe and sustained pain. The strapado would invariably get its victim to confess to anything, very quickly. During World War II, this same technique was widely adopted and used by the Germans, who called it Pfahlbinden. In the English of the Bush Administration, this technique is called a “stress position,†and it was widely used at Abu Ghraib.
Hypothermia. Shortly after the Bolshevik Revolution, the Soviet secret police pioneered a very simple technique that had the advantage of leaving the victim’s body unbruised or bloodied, but whose physiological effects were equally if not more effective than direct beatings. In its mildest form, the victim was left with thin clothing in a cell with temperatures hovering just above freezing. A day of such treatment was generally enough to produce physical collapse. The Bush Administration, of course, not having the benefits of a Siberian winter, turns to far cruder and more brutal techniques, which Davis describes. The prisoner is stripped naked, dunked in a bath of ice water, and a window is left open to insure exposure.
For President Bush, these techniques are a part of the “Program.†More generally in the American media, you’ll hear these things referred to as “highly coercive techniques.†But they have a proper name, which is “torture.â€
This … is … VILE. There is no excuse for this. There is no justification for this. This is a black mark on the honor of our nation that will take decades to erase … if ever.
I don’t think Bush, Cheney or their inner cadre are going to be doing much international travel once Dubya is no longer president. More than likely some country would ship them to The Hague in shackles. Of course that’s exactly what they deserve.
Hat Tip: Andrew Sullivan.
6 responses so far ↓
1
sctobrien
// Mar 30, 2008 at 12:54 am
Be careful….you’ll get tagged as an unpatriotic, America hating, pro-terrorist blogger if you keep pointing out things like this.
On a serious note, what I still find so disgusting to this day is that of those Abu Ghraib, the people in the lesser of ranks have been the only ones punished.
Like some reservist from West Virginia or some other small American town knows about the things that really offend Muslims.
2
Knight in Dragonland
// Mar 30, 2008 at 1:24 am
The pressure to obtain information at any cost clearly came from high in the chain of command.
3
Michael
// Mar 30, 2008 at 8:56 am
The ignorance of those who use these tactics is stunning. The most successful prisoner interrogations use no violence at all. The worst intelligence information is received from those who are tortured … they will tell you anything to stop the pain. So … if the moral issues weren’t reason enough alone … torture just doesn’t work anyway.
4
chef Kevin
// Mar 30, 2008 at 2:35 pm
Load them up on a half dozen triple Starbuck espressos and 2 quarts of Red Bull then force them to watch Martha Stewart “Living” in Dolby Surround Sound until they “crack”.
5
Knight in Dragonland
// Mar 30, 2008 at 6:56 pm
Kevin! I never knew you were such a sadist! I’m very disturbed …
6
mortonmalaise
// Mar 31, 2008 at 12:55 pm
I believe Dick Cheney’s response would be, “So?”
Leave a Comment